Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency trading involves substantial risk of loss. Always do your own research (DYOR) and never trade with money you cannot afford to lose.

COMPARISON 24 May 2026 7 min read

Trojan vs T7 Pilot: which Solana bot fits which trader

Trojan vs T7 Pilot side by side. Effective fee per trade with cashback, multi-level referral structure, features, and which one fits which trader.

Trojan and T7 Pilot are both Solana Telegram trading bots, but they serve different traders. Trojan ships a deeper feature surface and a multi-level referral pyramid. T7 Pilot ships a cheaper effective per-trade fee once cashback is counted, a flat lifetime referral, and a public dashboard. Here's the side by side, with the fee math and the trader profile each one fits best.

Fees compared with a wrinkle

Per CoinGecko's overview, Trojan charges 1% per swap by default and 0.9% if you signed up under a referral link [coingecko-bots]. The discount is a one-time benefit at registration, not a switch you can toggle later.

T7 Pilot charges a 0.75% base fee on every successful swap, then automatically credits 10% of that fee back to the user's trading wallet on a periodic cron, so the net effective fee everyone pays is 0.675% [t7-pilot-page]. There is no opt-in and no claim flow for the cashback. Users who signed up through someone's referral link also get a further 0.9x multiplier on the base, which combined with cashback lands at 0.6075% effective for referees [t7-pilot-page].

On a 1 SOL trade, Trojan takes 0.01 SOL by default or 0.009 SOL with the referral discount [coingecko-bots]. T7 Pilot takes 0.0075 SOL upfront then returns 0.00075 SOL on the next payout, for a net 0.00675 SOL effective at the 0.675% rate [t7-pilot-page]. The annual gap depends on your trade count.

A trader doing 300 trades a year at 1 SOL average size pays 3 SOL on Trojan default, 2.7 SOL with Trojan's referral discount, and 2.025 SOL on T7 Pilot once cashback settles at 0.675% effective [coingecko-bots] [t7-pilot-page]. The gap to Trojan is roughly 25% of your annual fee bill against the referral rate, and roughly 33% against the standard 1% rate [t7-fees].

The referral structures: pyramid vs flat lifetime

This is where the two bots take opposite philosophies.

Trojan runs a five-level referral chain per CoinGecko: 25% on direct referrals, 3.5% on layer two, 2.5% on layer three, 2% on layer four, 1% on layer five [coingecko-bots]. If your referral signs up someone, you get 3.5% of the new user's fees forever. The deeper layers stack, but each layer's percentage is small.

T7 Pilot pays a flat 30% on direct referrals only, no multi-level chain, no decay schedule [t7-pilot-page]. You refer them, you get 30% of every fee they ever pay. Their referrals are theirs. The referee also keeps the permanent 0.9x discount on the base fee, so the link is meaningful to the person clicking it, not just to the sharer [t7-pilot-page].

For a creator running their first audience, the comparison comes down to: do you trust your direct referrals to convert, and do you trust your secondary network to compound? Trojan's pyramid pays out if you can build a referral tree several layers deep [coingecko-bots]. T7 Pilot's flat 30% [t7-pilot-page] pays out if your direct list trades a lot and stays. For most retail-facing creators, the direct-only model is the simpler and higher-conviction bet because it doesn't depend on chain effects you can't observe or control.

There's also the math of headline rates. Trojan's 25% direct is below T7 Pilot's 30% direct [coingecko-bots] [t7-pilot-page]. The 5% gap on direct payouts is real money over a year of even modest trading volume. The pyramid only beats the flat-30 model if your secondary referrals do meaningful volume, which is the part most creators can't control.

Features: where each bot goes deeper

Trojan ships a Simple and Advanced mode toggle, MEV protection, limit orders, DCA, copy trading, launch sniping with rug-pull protections, and a cross-chain bridge per CoinGecko [coingecko-bots]. That's a wide feature surface aimed at traders who want one bot for everything from memecoin entries to scheduled DCA to cross-chain rotations.

T7 Pilot ships a tighter set built around event triggers and safer copy trading: paste-CA buy and sell, copy trading with per-wallet safety filters via /copyfilter (minimum liquidity, market-cap bands, max SOL per copied buy, pump.fun gating, blacklists), take-profit, stop-loss, trailing stops, in-house limit orders, plus two event-driven order types Trojan does not currently offer [t7-pilot-page]. Dev Sell exits the moment the token's deployer wallet sells any of its own bag, which is the strongest pre-collapse signal on pump.fun launches. Migration fires the moment a token graduates off pump.fun's bonding curve to Raydium or Meteora, useful both as a take-profit at the local top and as a buy trigger for the post-graduation pump. Neither is price-based, so the user does not have to guess a price.

If you want a single bot that handles your DCA scheduling, your launch entries, and your cross-chain moves, Trojan covers more of that surface today. If you want a smaller tool that does paste-CA trading, filtered copy trading, and event-driven exits at the cheaper effective rate, T7 Pilot fits. The simpler surface is also the trade-off: less to break, less to misconfigure, less to read in the docs.

Public dashboard and onboarding

T7 Pilot ships a public dashboard at t7systems.net with live SOL price, trending tokens, fresh pair launches, a paste-CA rug check, and a curated copy-wallet list with one-tap mirroring into the bot [t7-pilot-page]. None of that requires a login or starting the bot first.

Trojan's onboarding goes through the bot directly. The product surface is inside Telegram, which is a deliberate choice and matches how the existing user base prefers to use it.

For a trader new to Solana who wants to research a token before they trade, the public dashboard is meaningful. For a trader who already lives in Telegram and just wants the trading interface, the bot-only model is fine.

Copy trading

Both bots support wallet copy trading. Both let you specify a per-trade size and mirror entries and exits from a target wallet.

T7 Pilot publishes its curated wallet list on the public dashboard [t7-pilot-page], so you can browse styles (memecoin scalpers, DeFi rotators, fresh-launch traders) and tap to copy any of them. The bot also lets each copied wallet carry its own safety filter set, so a user can run tight rules on one trader (require renounced mint plus minimum liquidity, skip pump.fun tokens) and looser rules on another [t7-pilot-page]. Trojan supports the underlying mechanic but does not publish a comparable open list of wallets to copy or per-wallet filter syntax.

If you already know which wallets you want to copy, both bots work. If you want a curated starting set and per-wallet guardrails, T7 Pilot ships those out of the box.

Pricing model

T7 Pilot has one pricing model for everyone: 0.75% base on each successful trade, minus 10% cashback on every fee paid, landing at 0.675% effective with no opt-in [t7-pilot-page] [t7-fees]. Referees pay a further 0.9x on the base for 0.6075% effective [t7-pilot-page]. No subscription, no premium upgrade, no trade-size or wallet-count caps. Failed trades are not charged.

Trojan's standard fee is 1% per trade [coingecko-bots], with a separate referral rebate path for users with active inviters.

What hasn't been compared

Latency. Neither bot publishes a credible time-to-confirmation benchmark we can independently verify. Both depend on Jupiter routing and Solana's network conditions. Self-reported "fastest" claims should be treated with skepticism on either side.

User base size. Trojan has a substantially larger active user count and a longer track record. That cuts both ways: more product investment and battle-testing on Trojan's side, less crowding into the same memecoin entries on T7 Pilot's smaller side.

Long-term referral retention. Trojan's pyramid has been live longer and there are public examples of high-earning affiliates. T7 Pilot's flat-30 model is simpler to forecast but newer; long-term affiliate income data isn't yet public.

Cross-chain. Trojan's bridge is a real feature [coingecko-bots]. T7 Pilot is Solana-only by design today and there is no current roadmap to add other chains.

Which one fits which trader

Pick Trojan if:

Pick T7 Pilot if:

Bottom line

Trojan is the established, deeper, broader-surface option with a multi-level referral structure that rewards builders of multi-tier networks. T7 Pilot is the cheaper, simpler, fee-honest option with a higher direct referral rate, event-driven exits, and a public dashboard.

For a trader picking their first bot in 2026, the right question isn't "which is better" but "which feature surface do I actually use." If you'd genuinely use DCA, sniping, and cross-chain in the next 90 days, Trojan covers that. If your honest trading style is paste-CA buys, filtered copy trading, and event triggers like Dev Sell and Migration to handle exits, T7 Pilot is the cheaper tool and the simpler tool.

Try T7 Pilot at t.me/T7PilotBot. 0.675% effective fee with cashback [t7-pilot-page], no subscription, 30% lifetime referrals on every fee a friend ever pays.

Sources

Risk Warning: This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and trading involves substantial risk of loss. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own research and consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions. Only trade with funds you can afford to lose entirely.